Seerene
Customers and evidence

Evidence you can check, classified the way a board would want it.

Seerene customers span industrial manufacturing, automotive, financial services and insurance, logistics, public-sector technology and retail platforms. What they share is scale, not sector. Customers, documented decisions and voices from the Network are identified as such on this page.

Customers creating value with Seerene
SAPAudiBMWContinentalHellaHenkelHeidelberger DruckREWE SystemsDeutsche PostErste BankRaiffeisenbank ÖsterreichDBS BankSchufaBundesagentur für ArbeitAutoScout24Ping AnQIAGEN
Customer voices

In the words of those who use it

Three statements as published on seerene.com, anonymized at the organizations’ request.

Head of Software Engineering · Global industrial enterprise

“For the first time, we had an objective view across all our software production lines. Not a report generated by our own team — an independent fact. The board conversation changed immediately.”

Reported outcome: 23% capacity recovery in the first six months.

Chief Technology Officer · Large automotive manufacturer

“We discovered that 40% of our highest-paid engineers were effectively working on the same legacy module. We had no visibility into that until Seerene established the baseline.”

Reported outcome: knowledge risk removed within the first quarter.

Chief Digital Officer · European financial services group

“The board no longer has to take our word for it. The data is independent, normalized, and continuously current. That changes the governance conversation at the highest level.”

Reported outcome: an objective system of record for board reporting.

Use cases

Decisions Seerene helps you make

Explore how a shared evidence base supports sourcing, structural improvements, application risk and portfolio priorities.

Compare external delivery partners

Are our delivery partners being assessed on a consistent basis?

Compare software quality and delivery patterns across providers on agreed KPIs. Use the evidence to discuss sourcing decisions and make service levels measurable.

Decision supported

Discuss sourcing decisions and service levels on comparable evidence.

Discuss this decision →
Portfolio comparison · Digital Boardroom view: every bubble is one software system, placed and sized by the indicators selected in the view, so systems built by different providers are read on the same scale. Open to enlarge.

Prioritize structural improvements

Which improvement should we fund first, and how will we review its effect?

Show where complexity and concentrated change effort deserve attention. Give engineering and management a shared basis for refactoring decisions, then track the same indicators over time.

Decision supported

Fund the refactoring with a stated expected effect, then review the same indicators on an agreed date.

Discuss this decision →
Software Map · Digital Boardroom view: each building is a code area, height shows complexity, color marks structural risk hotspots. Open to enlarge.

Review risk in critical applications

Which systems need preventive attention?

Follow quality, change activity and knowledge concentration in critical applications. Use agreed indicators to prioritize preventive action and review improvements.

Decision supported

Prioritize preventive action per application and set the date for the next review.

Discuss this decision →
Structural indicators by system · Digital Boardroom view: one row per system with code size, cognitive complexity, critical violations and deactivated code, each with its recent change; darker cells mark higher values. Open to enlarge.

Connect portfolio priorities with evidence

Where should leadership focus across the software portfolio?

Bring application-level indicators into one executive view. Identify which systems need attention and connect portfolio priorities with agreed engineering KPIs.

Decision supported

Set portfolio priorities and connect them with agreed engineering KPIs and a review rhythm.

Discuss this decision →
Capacity flow by production line · Digital Boardroom view: from 100 % developer time to the time remaining for value-add; the colored outflows are the shares absorbed by below-the-radar work, defect-fixing tickets, rework after CI or code-review rejection, work in complex code and ad-hoc tickets. Open to enlarge.
Product views show the Digital Boardroom on demonstration datasets; customer statements and project references are identified separately. Project references from comparable engagements are discussed in the briefing, with the organizations’ consent.See what our customers say →Executive Brief →
Executive voices and media

Hear it from the executives, and read the coverage.

Recorded talks and panels with customers and Network members on Seerene’s YouTube channel, and selected media contributions and coverage.

YouTube · Seerene channel
See what our customers say
Customer conversations and executive perspectives on software production.
Open the channel →
Talk · with Bosch
Enabling strategic steering and management of large-scale software development organizations
Dr. Johannes Bohnet together with Bosch, recorded talk. A practice perspective, not a quantified product effect.
Watch →
Talk · AI coding
Leveraging the power of AI-based code production
Why code volume alone says nothing about quality and maintainability.
Watch →
Handelsblatt
Handelsblatt
Drei Herausforderungen bei der Anwendung von KI und die Rolle von Deep Tech
Guest contribution, March 2020 · German
Read the article (PDF) →
Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung
Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung
Ein Programm wie eine Skyline
Manfred Schäfers · Portrait in the series Die Gründer, 13 September 2016 · German
Read the article →
manager magazin
manager magazin
When software errors destroy millions of dollars every second
Interview · German
Read the article →
DIALOG · EFESO Management Consultants
DIALOG · EFESO Management Consultants
„Die Code-Stadt ist immer im Umbau.“
Interview with Dr. Johannes Bohnet · DIALOG #67, Code Excellence · German
Read the interview →
Further reading in CIO
Further reading in CIO
Herausforderung für CIOs: Die Ära der Software Factory
Oliver Viel · 9 November 2020 · German · article by Seerene’s Chief Communication Officer
Read the article →
Downloads

Material to forward internally.

The documents and files most often requested after a briefing. Downloads are released after you leave your contact details once; the Executive Brief and the press contact are open.

Executive Brief · one page
Why software production needs governance on evidence, and how the Digital Boardroom provides it
Written for the executive who has to decide. Opens as a page, prints to one sheet.
Open the Executive Brief →
Press · boilerplate
Seerene is the Digital Boardroom for Software Production Governance.
Generative AI Seerene GmbH, Potsdam. One independent, portfolio-level view of cost, capacity, quality, risk and AI impact in software production; founded on research at the Hasso Plattner Institute. Press contact: hello@seerene.com
Press contact →

Contact details are used to provide the material and for a short follow-up, as described in the privacy policy.

Dr. Jürgen Müller
5+ yrs CTO, SAP SE · Hasso Plattner Foundation
Dr. Jürgen Müller
“When software becomes the core of enterprise value creation, governing its production with the same rigor we apply to financial capital is a strategic imperative.”
Dr. Jürgen Sturm
former Group CIO, ZF Friedrichshafen AG · former CIO, Bosch and Siemens Home Appliances
Dr. Jürgen Sturm
“We would never run a factory without real-time visibility into quality, throughput, and bottlenecks. As AI accelerates software creation, software engineering should be managed with the same transparency as any other critical production system.”
Sectors

Where the approach has been applied

Industrial manufacturing, automotive, financial services and insurance, logistics, public sector technology and retail platforms. The model does not depend on sector: it depends on an organization producing software at a scale where no single team or tool can describe the whole. Sector pages are not planned; the evidence above is organized by what was decided, not by industry.

Ask for the evidence that matches your decision

In an Executive Briefing we can walk through a case that resembles your situation, with the organization’s consent, and show how the baseline was scoped.

Customers and evidence

Evidence you can check, classified the way a board would want it.

Seerene customers span industrial manufacturing, automotive, financial services and insurance, logistics, public-sector technology and retail platforms. What they share is scale, not sector. Customers, documented decisions and voices from the Network are identified as such on this page.

Customers creating value with Seerene

Customer voices

In the words of those who use it

Three statements as published on seerene.com, anonymized at the organizations’ request.

Use cases

Decisions Seerene helps you make

Explore how a shared evidence base supports sourcing, structural improvements, application risk and portfolio priorities.

Product views show the Digital Boardroom on demonstration datasets; customer statements and project references are identified separately. Project references from comparable engagements are discussed in the briefing, with the organizations’ consent.

Executive voices and media

Hear it from the executives, and read the coverage.

Recorded talks and panels with customers and Network members on Seerene’s YouTube channel, and selected media contributions and coverage.

Downloads

Material to forward internally.

The documents and files most often requested after a briefing. Downloads are released after you leave your contact details once; the Executive Brief and the press contact are open.

Contact details are used to provide the material and for a short follow-up, as described in the privacy policy.

Sectors

Where the approach has been applied

Industrial manufacturing, automotive, financial services and insurance, logistics, public sector technology and retail platforms. The model does not depend on sector: it depends on an organization producing software at a scale where no single team or tool can describe the whole. Sector pages are not planned; the evidence above is organized by what was decided, not by industry.

Ask for the evidence that matches your decision

In an Executive Briefing we can walk through a case that resembles your situation, with the organization’s consent, and show how the baseline was scoped.